Oppenheimer: Mentally Unstable Incompetent Brat and Attempted Murderer who Silenced Bohm
Christopher Nolan's movie was worthless for not talking about any of this.
Oppenheimer was a real piece of trash, spoiled brat who desperately needed discipline, and a raving lunatic who tried but failed to murder two people (but possibly successfully murdered a lot more with the atomic bomb.) Oppenheimer shouldn’t have gotten a movie about him, David Bohm should’ve gotten a movie about him and Oppenheimer should’ve been the psycho villain in Bohm’s movie because that’s what he was. Bohm is more deserving of posts than SchizOppenheimer which is why Bohm is going to get a lot more posts than SchizOppenheimer, but this will come naturally, mutants and norms, once I read some of Bohm’s books, one of which I bought recently. I’m going to link to posts about Bohm before I link to posts about Oppenheimer in Oppenheimer’s own post just to be extra irritating to Oppenheimer’s ghost who’s almost certainly burning in Hell and will most likely be forced by Satan to reread my post for all eternity. This shall also motivate me to work on my own film AI so I can make the Bohm film as well as the movie/shows of The Symmetry Breakers (more on what this is coming soon) and all the things certain Hollywood idiots don’t want you to see (notice I’m not someone who blames it on all of Hollywood, there are just lots of idiots within Hollywood but it’s not a homogenous blob. For example, Christopher Nolan, who decided Oppenheimer was more worthy of a film than Bohm, who didn’t even get a clear-cut cameo.)
David Bohm silenced by his colleagues - Infinite Potential
A Scholar Finally Gets His Due: David Bohm | Princeton Alumni Weekly
Why Is Christopher Langan So Unsuccessful? (Outliers) | Shortform Books
Christopher Langan was so unsuccessful because he had a paper-thin skin and blamed everything on people besides himself, especially Jews. Also he doesn’t even have the highest score on the Mega Test, not that I think the Mega Test is a great way to measure IQ even if you probably do have to be a genius to score high on it, because the people who make all these IQ tests including the special ones are not very sophisticated, IQ tests basically just test for intellectual disabilities and Einstein, Hawking, etc. don’t take them. But a woman scored higher than him, Marilyn vos Savant, and since she’s wasting her life writing a newspaper column I also doubt she’s the smartest person but that’s another story.
On the other hand Robert Oppenheimer was so-called “successful” because he was a trust fund kid despite being a schizo who tried to murder people twice and sucking at physics. Want to know why physics is so behind where it should be? Because a bunch of trust fund kids who were like “I want to be smart!” obfuscated everything, and their leader was a failed spree killer with mental problems. Yet people want a movie about him and not Bohm, because you have to actually be smart to understand Bohm, you don’t have to be smart to understand the crazy dude, you just have to wonder what it felt like to kill a bunch of people. Well, if you’re Oppenheimer, it probably felt pretty great because you failed to kill two other people so third time’s the charm. What a charming character. Not.
Have some more Bohm in Oppenheimer’s article, because Oppenheimer just didn’t do anything interesting. Trying to kill two people isn’t all that interesting, the successful killers are more interesting. Unless maybe nuking people is successful killing, but it’s still more interesting to create than destroy. Don’t let the crazy people tell you to build bombs, especially when their only talent is manic logorrhea, not actually physics. If you’re Lyndon LaRouche the most evil person is Bertrand Russell, and even though I don’t like LaRouche and all his fascist garbage Bertrand Russell probably really was worse than Hitler. However Oppenheimer might be up there too. Adopt a bad philosophy and your soul rots, then you start killing everyone, and you lose your mind too, or a bad philosophy comes out of a reeking and rotting weak mind.
You also have to be strong to like Conan the Barbarian and not let people tell you all the pulps are worthless trash and try to get you to read actual worthless trash like Dragonlance and Prince Valiant instead. Long live the pulps, you have to earn your right to like them and then you learn things from them that make you stronger.
Still not as interesting as Bohm who actually produced things and didn’t try to murder anyone even if he considered communism for a short while. Ah, yes, dabbling in temporarily being far-left in college before quitting it once you realize it’s naïve and doesn’t work, what an unforgiveable sin, none of us have ever been far-left in college before shifting over to something more moderate (left, right, or center.) This is totally a lot worse than trying to murder people, but then, when you have a trust fund, you can attempt to murder people, but when you don’t have a trust fund, you can’t go to a communist meeting before deciding you don’t actually like communism. Never mind that J. Robert Oppenheimer was a committed communist until the end and most likely indirectly helped the Soviets.
The Real Tragedy of Robert Oppenheimer | Science History Institute
So yes, this will be a reminder for me to work on my AI and if anyone wants to help me, please join in. It’s criminal that Oppenheimer gets some kind of pretentious commemoration but Bohm isn’t even in it because it’d make Oppenheimer look completely unsympathetic, which the lunatic was completely unsympathetic. Metamorphology AI biopic on Bohm: In which Bohm tries to make the world better and Oppenheimer is a mentally-unstable and physically repulsive villain just wants to see the world burn.
And a Red.
Not having seen the film I can only imagine it being what Hollywood thinks of when someone says 'Good Cinema'. With vivid color and a smattering of historical truth it was the only possible competitor to Barbie, and a good counterpoint to the less serious Summer films we usually see.
A few years ago, Robert McNamara admitted that the US role in Vietnam was a grim mistake. I think it a matter of conscience that his confession, which was meant to soothe others did little to nothing for many of us whose lives, friends and family were touched by that war.
I met Oppenheimer in his decline, a tall sickly man whose remorse was equally genuine and as mentally crippling as McNamaras'. Last year I read the FBI file on Oppenheimer - more than ninety pages. It showed a moral conflict few could ever imagine.
We could argue that mental instability came from or was caused by what he did, either is possible, but not incompetence...