Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jessica J's avatar

Karl Marx was a drunk who made his wife do everything and didn't really love her while this would have made him a hit in the C suite aka land of the Borg enforcers he did not understand the Nifelheim that corporate culture is especially in middle management as he was also a failed aristocrat that drank up his families vodka money they got from the czars and enjoyed his time with the little folk but didn't even understand how to manage land or workers to get positive results. In modern terms he had real hating ass fat girl energy and had he been a trans fat influencer if cell phones had been around then would we even be talking about Marx. The next Marx is probably addicted to trans rights videos high af on the tok right now and has ruined their attention span so bad that they need a month in the mountains without a phone

Expand full comment
Strategy Pattern (Don’t Laugh)'s avatar

I recently watched a “A Christmas Carol” 1938. In the film there is Scrooge, but also Mr. Fezziwig.

Mr. Fezziwig operates a business, but his operations are local and artisanal. His view of business generally is more cheerful and beneficial to his neighbors. His business was the type of business that mainly existed prior to mass transportation and industrialization and struggle in our modern economic environment. Scrooge at the end of the film is redeemed to be more like Mr. Fezziwig.

Various distance tax policies like tariffs and transport taxes dramatically shift businesses towards a more local orientation offering protectionism while businesses grow locally.

It is arguable that if the people are going to be taxed anyway that they should be taxed in such a way that has the positive benefit of community formation as opposed to something else.

Protectionism towards small local businesses may reduce the negative consequences of corporate power.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts